Skip to main content

Metoo

The #metoo movement has been a polarizing movement over the past two and a half years since it gained major steam in 2017. The phrase #metoo comes form victims of sexual assault telling stories of their assaults and listeners realizing they too have been assaulted. Then those listeners telling their own stories of sexual assault.  The movement has touched many different fields and is not unique to any small sect of work or people. The sports industry with Larry Nassar, entertainment with Bill Cosby, media with Matt Lauer and politics with Al Franken. It's great that people are speaking out and holding their assaulters accountable and responsible for the actions/behaviors. There has been so much outpour and stories coming out and it's unfortunate for the people with real experiences of assault when others come out with fabricated ones. One of the founders of the French #metoo movement Sandra Muller is paying thousands of dollars in defamation because of her accusation that a man named Eric Biron was making lewd comments about her. The comment made was a tweet that roughly translates from French to "squeal your pig". Biron does not deny making the tweet and admits that it was inappropriate and actually apologized Muller the next day over text to no response. Biron is claiming defamation due to the characterization that his tweet was sexual assault and also due to her claim that it was sexual assault in the wake of the Metoo movement he has been harassed for an innapportiate comment. Muller will not be appealing to the court's decisions.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/25/europe/french-metoo-founder-defamation-intl/index.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAH

I have already watched the movie Joker and I personally think it was fantastic and that Joaquim Pheonix deserves to have his rendition put up with the Jack Nicholson and Heath Leadergers joker. The new gritty movie despite its accolades has come under immense scrutiny for the gun violence shown in the movie. Groups of people are claiming it is going to lead to more gun violence or violence in general due to the main character enjoying when he kills people. Normally the antagonist is the one who enjoys hurting or killing people but in this movie, that character is the protagonist and people are believing that is not healthy. People are worried that this will encourage kids to commit more school shootings. My opinion on the matter is people are being stupid. The movie is R rated, its meant for people above the age of 17.  Now obviously they can still view the movie if accompanied by an adult which is usually their parent. Which means the parent is enabling and chaperoning them to go se

South park makes fun of another group

In the most recent episode of South Park, the plot revolves around the satirization of transgender athletes. In the episode, a "Randy Savage" looking character comes to a female competition claiming to have just started identifying as a female two weeks prior and ends up winning the competition. The episode has sparked controversy mainly from the transgender community about how the show is being transphobic. One of the most famous or infamous transgender athletes Rachel Mckinnon called the show "lazily written and transphobic". This episode helps bring to light the issue of transgender athletes, males who transitioned to females, in women's sports. To those who claim they just want to keep sports fair, the transgender community claims it was never fair and allowing these transgender females to compete is no different as Micheal Phelps long torso or Yao Ming being 7'6. However, there needs to be some sort of segregation in the sexes for the sport to preserve

NCAA try to save face

The NCAA has finally come with the times and is now acting to "embrace change" by allowing college athletes to be paid for use of their name image and likeness. This is not a new problem and has been talked about and made fun of for years and years. Even the Olympics, the most prestigious sporting event in history, has allowed athletes to participate and sponsored for more than 30 years. So now that athletes in the NCAA will be able to profit what is next. It is agreed upon the school can not and will not directly pay the athlete. But let's say the coach of a team starts a shoe business and signs all his athletes to that shoe brand and any recruits who sign will get a shoe deal as well. Won't that create bad recruiting practices? What do you think